Agents execute. Humans govern.
Governance is designed into the chain, not added afterwards. Two human gates, protected data, every agent evaluated and reversible.
Two gates and two reviews, built into the chain.
The chain stops and waits. No setting lets an agent skip a gate.
QA approves cases
Before any automation starts. A misunderstood requirement stops here.
Test code reviewed
Generated and repaired tests are reviewed before they are merged.
Defects validated
A human confirms a defect before a ticket is opened in your tracker.
The QA lead decides the release
On the quality report, with the decision documented.
No rubber stamps. Every output is evaluated automatically and the review queue is sorted with the least confident items first, so reviewers spend their attention where it matters. Agreement between the evaluation and your reviewers is measured.
Your data follows a protected route, every time.
- Read-only on sourcesAgents read your sources; they never modify them.
- Anonymised before every callSensitive data is removed before any AI model sees it.
- Writes only in testAgents only write in the test environment, never in production.
- Credentials stay hiddenUsed only at run time, never shown to an agent.
The risks of AI agents, named and controlled.
Your security team will ask. Here are the answers.
| Risk | What could happen | How TuringOne controls it |
|---|---|---|
| Manipulated instructions | Hidden instructions in tickets, documentation or screen text. | Content read from your sources is treated as data, never as instructions; outputs are checked against expected formats; each agent only has the permissions its job needs. |
| Agents doing too much | An agent acts beyond what it should. | No writing in production; human gates and reviews before anything is merged or opened. |
| Data leakage | Sensitive data reaches an external model. | Anonymisation before every AI call; EU or in-house models. |
| Degraded context | Wrong or altered context lowers output quality. | Versioned instructions and context; rollback per agent. |
Everything traceable. Everything reversible.
When anyone asks “why did this test change?” or “who approved this release?”, the answer is already written down.
- Every run recorded with each agent action and decision.
- Every human validation logged at each gate and review.
- Versioned instructions so you know which version produced which output.
- Rollback per agent when a change lowers quality.
- Every agent evaluated through automatic evaluation and indicators, not simply trusted.
Three commitments behind every run.
Humans decide
Agents prepare and execute. People approve what is tested and what ships.
Tests are never weakened
Assertions, expected values and business steps are locked for every agent.
You stay independent
Tests live in your tools and keep running without TuringOne.
Bring your governance questions.
We'll go through the human gates, the data flow and the controls with your team before any pilot starts.